In states implementing additional charges, net metering caps & other regulatory changes: “Can storage rescue solar?”

By Todd Olinsky-Paul, Clean Energy Group

Todd Olinsky-Paul postIn addition to benefiting customers: From the utility perspective, behind the meter storage should be viewed as an opportunity as well. After all, the more storage is paired with solar, the more control we will have over solar’s variable output, which is the main issue utilities cite for limiting the amount of solar on their networks (a potential $2 billion in lost revenue to conventional generators from rooftop solar is rarely mentioned). The more forward-looking utilities are even investing in small behind-the-meter storage systems at customer sites, which they can use to provide grid services and cut costs, while providing resilient power and other services to the host.

Unfortunately, the majority of utilities seem to be either neutral or negative on the question of distributed energy resources in general, and solar in particular. As Rocky Mountain Institute predicted more than a year ago, the more utilities try to decrease incentives and add fees for solar customers, the more incentive these customers will have to invest in storage, as a way to protect the value of their solar investment and further reduce their reliance on grid-purchased electricity.
Read the entire post here.

The Case for Solar+Storage Tax Credits: Clean Energy Group’s Comments to the IRS Vermont Microgrid Included in State Energy Plan as Example for Replication
New Jersey Opens First US Energy Storage Rebate Program